Tasigna Atherosclerosis Lawsuit News

Novartis Fraudulent Marketing Deception

Novartis sales reps knew Tasigna was linked to atherosclerosis

Tuesday, May 29, 2018 - Medical patients have the right to all of the facts pertaining to the side effects of their medicine so that they can make an informed decision as to the treatment of their disease. When material facts are withheld or misstated unforeseen side effects can have life and death consequences. Medicines used in the treatment of cancer are so toxic that they can easily cause death all by themselves if misused and can only be distributed by "specialty pharmacies," unlike other drugs like antibiotics that are more readily available at popular commercial drug stores. Consumers expect more from a specialty pharmacist and their integrity must be beyond reproach. This bond of trust was breached when Novartis maker of the anti-cancer chemotherapy drug, Tasigna, broke the law with a fraudulent and illegal marketing scheme to incentivize specialty pharmacists to prescribe the deadly drug to unsuspecting and trusting cancer patients.

Several years ago, Gleevec, the original and top-selling anti-cancer drug marketed by Novartis, was heralded as a breakthrough in fighting cancer. Studies showed that patients taking Gleevec had what is called a "complete hematological response." In oncology terms, this means that a cancer patient's white blood cell count returned to within a normal range in 53 out of 54 patients studied within four weeks of the start of treatment. After 5 years, over 98 percent had normal levels of white blood cells. Because of Gleevec, survival rates skyrocketed as did Gleevec sales. Novartis booked close to $5 billion in sales in 2015 from the Gleevec brand alone. Problems started, however, when the drug's limited patent was set to expire at the end of the year, and cheaper generic knock-offs were poised to devastate Novartis' share of the anti-cancer drug market. Years earlier, Novartis had lost billions in sales when another of their drugs, Diovan, went off patent and sales were cannibalized by generic drug makers. Novartis was not going to let that happen again.

To make up for what was sure to be the loss of billions of dollars in revenue from Gleevec sales, Novartis brought Tasigna, a more potent anti-cancer drug to market prior to Gleevec's patent expiration. In what the US Department of Justice termed, "fraudulent, misleading and illegal marketing tactics," Novartis sales representatives incentivized specialty pharmacists to refill existing Gleevec prescriptions with Tasigna without approval from oncologists or patients. Novartis reps conducted illegal sales campaigns and paid cash bonuses to pharmacists that sold the most Tasigna each month. A Novartis sales manager turned company whistleblower testified that Novartis did all of this whilst knowing that Tasigna had the devastating side effect of causing necrosis of the feet, paralysis from massive strokes, and sudden death from heart attacks. For their deception, Novartis was sued by the DOJ and fined $1 billion dollars settling for a payment of $390 million. According to a DOJ spokesperson, "Novartis incentivized and pressured the pharmacies to emphasize benefits to patients while understating the drug's serious, potentially life-threatening side effects." Armed with this ironclad evidence against the company, Tasigna patients are hiring Tasigna atherosclerosis lawyers and filing claims against Novartis for failing to warn them of Tasigna's deadly side effect.

More Recent Tasigna Atherosclerosis Lawsuit News:

Lawyers for Tasigna Atherosclerosis Lawsuits

Attorneys handling Tasigna lawsuits for leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma offer free, no-obligation case review for individuals and families who believe they may have grounds to file a Tasigna lawsuit. Working on a contingency basis, these attorneys are committed to never charging legal fees unless they win compensation in your Tasigna lawsuit. The product liability litigators handling Roundup claims at the Onder Law Firm have a strong track record of success in representing families harmed by dangerous drugs and consumer products.